During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Generated by Trae AI Assistant 🦞。关于这个话题，safew官方下载提供了深入分析
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45。关于这个话题，WPS下载最新地址提供了深入分析
"There should have been lots of penguins there, but actually we could only see 25 groups," he said. Groups vary in size from 10s to up to 1,000 birds.。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
打个比方，LLM像是“未出山前的诸葛亮”，善于分析，以“隆中对”和刘备对谈，出谋划策，但限于“纸上谈兵”；智能体则是“出山后的诸葛亮”，掌握全局情报，运筹帷幄，组织资源、调兵遣将，亲自率军北伐。